|
|
|
November 25, 2009 |
|
Soft Dollar Case Raises Eyebrows |
(Dow Jones) Corporate compliance officers have been rolling their eyes at the
unfolding story of Terra Nova Financial LLC, the Chicago broker-dealer
fined $400,000 for making improper soft dollar payments on behalf of
five hedge fund managers. The case, announced by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (Finra) on Monday, has drawn attention for the
blatant impropriety of the payments.
According to Finra, Terra Nova arranged over $1 million in
improper soft-dollar payments, mostly for undocumented expenses and
research. Among the bills that Terra Nova covered was $65,000 worth of
credit card expenses that included meals, clothing, car repairs,
limousines, hotel stays and even parking tickets.
The biggest eyebrow-raiser was a $13,700 tab at a "gentlemen's club" over a two-week period.
Finra also sanctioned three former employees of the firm,
including Chief Compliance Officer David Persenaire, who it said made
payments that in some cases were obviously improper and in other cases
were not authorized by fund disclosure documents. The company and the
individuals have neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing, but have
consented to the findings.
It would be an understatement to say the news has turned
heads. "When a company is fined $400,000 on a compliance matter, we
tend to pay attention," says David Sobel, chief compliance officer at
Abel/Noser, an independent broker-dealer. But he added that the case
was so outrageous as to be an anomaly. "There's a lot more subtlety
going on in the soft-dollar world than this," he said. "Even Madoff was
a little more subtle than this."
Finra spokesman Herb Perone says the Terra Nova case arose
out of a general crackdown on improper soft-dollar payments three years
ago. It took so long to conclude, he says, because the company
obstructed the investigation. "The thing to remember is there are not a
lot of broker-dealer firms engaged in soft-dollar payments," he says.
"It's maybe the top 200 or 250." He added, however, that Finra is
involved in internal litigation on another soft-dollar investigation.
The Terra Nova case highlights the different rules that
govern soft-dollar payments made by ERISA-covered institutional
investors (like big mutual funds and pension plans) and those made by
non-ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) investors like
hedge funds. In both cases, soft-dollar payments to broker-dealers
offset hard-dollar commissions, thus allowing the funds to advertise
lower fees to investors. In the long run, of course, over-reliance on
soft-dollar payments will drag down investment performance (the money
comes from investors' gains), and so fund managers must weigh their use
carefully.
Soft-dollar payments made by ERISA-covered investors are
bound by Securities and Exchange Commission rule 28(e), which
establishes a "safe harbor" for certain types of carefully documented
soft-dollar expenses, such as legitimate stock research and clerical
expenses. "To me, 28(e) is very clear cut," says Sobel. "If you're
using soft dollars to pay for a computer system that will be used for
trading 73 percent of the time, that's legitimate, but you have to
deduct 27 percent of the cost."
By contrast, hedge funds and other non-ERISA investors work
in a soft-dollar gray area. While soft-dollar payments from such funds
are required to be used for the benefit of the fund's investors, it's
largely up to the fund itself to define what that means. The key is
disclosure.
"If the fund says in its prospectus that soft dollars will
be used to entertain clients, then the broker-dealer can pay for that,"
says Sobel. "It's okay because you disclosed it."
He added: "I don't think I would ever pay a bill for a topless bar. I can understand why Finra was ticked off."
Copyright (c) 2009, Dow Jones. For more information about Dow Jones' services for advisors, please click here.
|
|
Discussion
Should all advisors fall under one self-regulatory organization and could that happen on Mary Schapiro’s watch?
Join the Discussion
|
|