Subscribe_april2012

Sponsored by:

FA News

Print |
July 28, 2011

Naifa Endorses Finra As RIA Exam Overseer

The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (Naifa) today endorsed the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra) as the agency that should conduct examinations of SEC-registered investment advisors.

By a 16-0 vote, the Naifa Board of Trustees said Finra should conduct all RIA exams, claiming that it represents the most cost-effective solution.

Naifa noted that Finra already conducts exams for 55 percent of broker-dealers each year, and is subject to SEC oversight. Only 9 percent of RIAs face SEC examinations annually and roughly one-third of RIAs have never been examined.

"Naifa supports reasonable examinations to ensure that financial professionals are complying with the law," said Naifa President Terry K. Headley. "Because Naifa members are already subject to comprehensive broker-dealer regulations, engaging Finra to examine SEC-registered investment advisors will be the most efficient option for dually-registered Naifa members."

About 27 percent of Naifa members are investment advisor representatives, according to a survey conducted by LIMRA International. Of these, nearly all are dually-registered as registered representatives of broker-dealers, and thus, already subject to Finra regulatory oversight. Only 1 percent of Naifa's members are registered investment advisers not currently under Finra's regulatory jurisdiction.

"Our goal in supporting Finra as the SRO is to achieve efficiencies and avoid unnecessary duplication in the examination of dually-registered Naifa members," Headley said. "Simultaneous broker-dealer and registered investment adviser examinations would be less burdensome and intrusive than having to submit to different exams at different times in order to comply with different regulators."

 

 

 

Naifa Endorses Finra As RIA Exam Overseer

 
Comments
Stephen Winks  - If Regulatory Efficiency is a Concern, Just Suppor   |2011-08-01 10:35:09
It is interesting that NAIFA's objective is to achieve regulatory operating efficiencies at the expense of the consumer's best interest not being served.

The duplication in examination is rendered moot if brokers are held to the fiduciary standard of care. So in an effort to achieve operating efficiency why then wouldn't NAIFA support brokers and insurance agents being held to the same fiduciary standard of care as advisers?

Could it be that NAIFA is just opposed to insurance agents and brokers being held accountable for their recommendations and having on going fiduciary responsibilities required to act in the consumer's best interest?

SCW
Please login to write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 PW May 2012
Click Here

Online Extras

Putting Retirement Changes Into Perspective
Three major shifts are fundamentally changing retirement, says Columnist Robert Laura.
Read more...
 
Consider Adapting Asset Allocation To Retirement Spending Needs
“Chasing yield” can lead investors to buy questionable investments merely because they offer—at least temporarily—enticing income streams. To effectively manage retirement income, it’s important to consider the actual liabilities.
Read more...
 

FAgreen

Chesapeake Director’s Firm Paid $343 Million Amid Ties
Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s decision to cut directors’ pay and other perks may save the company up to $1.65 million a year without addressing investors’ concern that the board failed to rein in Chief Executive Officer Aubrey McClendon’s borrowing and spending spree.
Read more...

On The Move

LPL Financial Names Executive Vice President Of Business Consulting
Robert Comfort will lead business consulting for institutional services division.
Read more...
 
LPL Financial Names Managing Director And Chief Human Capital Officer
Sallie Larsen brings more than three decades of human resources experience to her new role.
Read more...
 

Quick Poll

Do you think buying Facebook shares now is a good idea?