In the biggest ethics scandal since it was founded in 1985, CFP Board of Standards Inc. Chairman Alan Goldfarb abruptly resigned in a Halloween Eve letter after becoming the subject of an ethics probe into whether he had violated the CFP Board’s standards for professional conduct. Two members of the board’s Disciplinary and Ethics Commission (DEC), which investigates allegations of CFP wrongdoing, resigned at the same time as Goldfarb.
With a mission “to benefit the public by granting the CFP certification and upholding it as the recognized standard of excellence for personal financial planning,” the CFP Board oversees the CFP mark held by
63,000 designees.
Broad allegations that members of its board of directors and other committees had violated the CFP Board’s standards of professional conduct spurred the board to investigate the trio. Because the board was investigating volunteers who had been responsible for enforcing the very rules they were suddenly accused of breaking, the board appointed a special committee comprised of its public directors with no ties to the financial services industry to conduct the inquiry.
The special committee retained outside counsel to investigate and report its findings. The counsel found enough merit to the allegations against the three to refer the matter to the DEC.
CFP Board policy prohibits commenting on disciplinary matters under investigation. However, CEO Kevin Keller made an exception to that policy after Goldfarb was quoted in the press saying the allegations claim he mischaracterized fee and commission compensation as salary from a broker-dealer where he is a principal.
Goldfarb says the compensation was salary and he did not commit any violation. He is a limited partner in Weaver and Tidwell Financial Advisors, a registered investment advisory firm in Dallas that does business as Weaver Wealth Management. He is also a broker with, and an owner of, Weaver Tidwell Capital LLC.
A spokeswoman for Goldfarb at Weaver told FA that the alleged ethics violation was the way his compensation was described on the Financial Planning Association’s Web site. Under Goldfarb’s listing on the FPA site in the section “How Planner Charges,” it says “salary.”
Keller shot back with his own public statement refuting Goldfarb: “Alan Goldfarb’s description of the alleged violation that is being referred for further proceedings under our disciplinary rules and procedures is not correct.”
What’s really going on? We may never know all the details. But the public sparring by Goldfarb and Keller makes it clear that the CFP Board suspects that what Goldfarb had reported as “salary” from his broker-dealer was actually fees and commissions.
Assuming the probe led the CFP Board to check for similar disclosure discrepancies beyond its board of directors, the two DEC members could possibly have had similar disclosure issues that led them to resign.
The CFP Board did not disclose the names of those two DEC members. However, the board’s Web site recently displayed the names of seven members of the DEC, while earlier it listed nine members. Absent from the latest version are Christina Florence, CFP, of Lane Florence LLC in Folsom, Calif., and Mary McFadden Hastings, CFP, of Wells Fargo Advisors, Waltham, Mass. Florence and Hastings did not return calls and e-mails for comment on whether they resigned from the DEC.
A CFP Board investigation has five possible outcomes: dismissal of the allegations; a private letter of admonition; a public letter of admonition; suspension of the right to use the CFP mark; or revocation of the right to use the mark.
Goldfarb and the two DEC members are affiliated with broker-dealers, and the CFP Board has recently been the subject of several reports in the consumer and trade press about its ability to embrace a fiduciary standard when many CFP designees are affiliated with a broker-dealer and compensated by commissions.
—Andrew Gluck
CFP Board Ethics Scandal
December 2012
« Previous Article
| Next Article »
Login in order to post a comment
Comments
-
The ethics issue that no one notice occurred this year when ads targeting the word CPA appeared on Google searches. The ads read: “Find A CPA Professional – www.letsmakeaplan.org - Prepare and submit tax returns with the help of a CFP® professional†and directed users to a website promoting Certified Financial Planners. Yes, you read correctly: the ad offered to find a CPA, then directed to a CFP. Should an organization supposedly protecting the public and representing ethical standards produce ads Rickrolling the public? Are bait-and-switch ads fair to the professional allies they target? More importantly, are they fair to the public? Do they paint CFPs in a positive light? Do they remind anyone of the marketing motives at the root of financial planning and financial planners? Every true profession is rooted in ethical values which guided its evolution. Medicine has “Do No Harm†and the Hippocratic Oath. Law has the presumption of innocence, defending liberty and delivering justice. CPAs have protecting the public interest and helping Americans make sense of financial complexity. By contrast, the CFP board has imperialist ambition to control the profession by focusing on growth while been dragged kicking and screaming towards the public interest and to its current half-backed fiduciary standard. To address its incurable shortcomings, the CFP organization must dismantle itself and rebuilt anew as a member-voting organization rooted in high values. Only an organization guided by its member can have any legitimate hope of self-governance and of truly serving the public. Only an organization rooted in unwavering values can withstand change without erring in all directions. It is time for a CFP democratic revolution and for roots set on higher ground.