Wages can also be influenced by the slack in the overall economy, measured in this case by the output gap, the difference between actual gross domestic product (GDP) and potential GDP [Figure 2]. An output gap below zero suggests that there is slack in the economy. When the output gap is negative — and moving further in that direction as it was between the start of the Great Recession and June 2009 — it puts tremendous downward pressure on wages. When the output gap is negative but improving, as it has been since mid-2009, the downward pressure on wages abates somewhat, and that is what we have seen in the wage data to date. In the period just prior to the start of the Great Recession in late 2007, wages were running at well over 4% on a year-over-year basis. By September 2012, after the economy had run below its long-term potential growth rate for more than five years, wage growth compressed to just 1.2%. A pickup the labor market and the overall economy since late 2012 has helped to narrow the output gap and driven wage growth into the 2 – 2.5% range, a big improvement, but still well below the pace seen prior to the Great Recession in the mid-2000s. It’s clear that the Fed, or at least Yellen, wants to see wages move closer to that 4.0% level before raising rates again.