There have been headlines aplenty about President Trump repealing environmental regulations through executive orders in the name of boosting business and corporate profits.

But impact investing has momentum, and such policies from the top probably won’t change that in the coming years, say a number of experts in the field.

US SIF, the Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment, says socially responsible investing grew by 33% between 2014 and 2016, and now accounts for $8.72 trillion in investments, whereas that figure was less than $1 trillion in 1995. Numerous studies, including one recent one from Morningstar, have shown that SRI investing doesn’t diminish returns.

“Companies that reduce carbon emissions are still a good investing bet,” says Meg Voorhes, US SIF’s research director. “Companies that have implemented these policies are not going to go back to polluting. There is a lot to be encouraged about” for environmentally positive investing.

“It may be a little too early in the Trump administration to tell what his policies will do to environmental investing, but one dollar out of every five dollars is now invested in socially responsible investing,” says Megan Fielding, senior director of responsible investing at Nuveen-afilliated TIAA Investments. “The demographics are already in place. Millennials and women in particular are aggressive about environment investing. That train has already left the station.”

Still, one way that administration policies could affect industries is by eliminating subsidies for markets such as renewable energy from the federal budget, Fielding says.

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a recent New York Times op-ed piece that the country is already moving toward environmental goals, and nothing a president does will reverse that. “Those who believe that the Trump administration will end American leadership on climate change are making the same mistake as those who believe that it will put coal miners back to work: overestimating Washington’s ability to influence energy markets, and underestimating the role that cities, states, businesses and consumers are playing in driving down emissions on their own,” Bloomberg wrote.

The same applies to other markets, says Jeff Finkelman, research associate for impact investments at Athena Capital Advisors. “Venture capital is focusing on sustainable agriculture and sustainable food, and U.S. equities are constantly coming up with new ETFs that are geared toward … impact investing.”

Chris Meyer, a manager of advocacy and research for Praxis mutual funds, sees expanding investment options in this space. “More companies are putting out green bonds, and companies that have pollution curbs in the works are not going to abandon them.”

The only issue he sees is that companies that have not undertaken environmental changes may hold back for now to see what President Trump does.

Julie Gorte, a senior vice president for sustainable investing at Pax World Investments, tries to keep the situation in perspective. “As far as the presidential impact on sustainable and ESG [environmental, social and corporate governance] investing is concerned, I am somewhere between ‘Don’t worry, be happy’ and Chicken Little’s ‘The sky is falling.’”