Can you put a price on the value of your advice, your standards and your relationships?
In recent years, independent advisors have been
deluged with marketing ideas about how to maintain and grow a
separately managed account (SMA) business. But what about the flip side
of the coin? What happens when it's time for those independents who
have built powerhouse SMA practices to take down their shingle and
retire?
By all rights, these successful advisors should be
able sell their practices for a handsome return and relax, knowing that
the buyer will treat these newly acquired clients with the same
nurturing and hands-on service they have come to expect. But when it
comes to selling a business, particularly one as personalized as an
SMA-based practice, nothing is quite so simple.
Several possible factors separate the sale of an SMA
practice from the more traditional fund-based or transaction-oriented
business. First, despite the staggering growth of SMAs (last year on a
percentage basis, assets in SMAs outpaced mutual funds by almost 100%),
it remains a niche business for independent advisors. That means,
experts say, that the chances of a seller finding a buyer with the same
knowledge and dedication to the product are far less than when dealing
with a fund-based business, a straight financial planning practice or a
transaction-based advisor.
And beyond that, according to industry experts, is
the very likely possibility that the prospective buyer, while
professing a commitment to keep the SMA practice as is, might well take
the obvious steps of attempting to convert clients back to the product
area he or she is most comfortable with or specializes in. When you
consider that many clients at least consider bolting when a
practice is sold and their advisor retires, the addition of a shift in
asset strategy is likely to cause even greater consternation for them.
And since the eventual sale price of the business is based on the
amount of clients and assets under management remaining with the
practice, too much change in that practice could possibly result in a
significant loss of expected or future revenue for the seller, as well
as the buyer.
"The concern is more acute for an SMA business,"
says one New York City-based SMA advisor who is contemplating selling
his business (and didn't want to be named because he hasn't discussed
it with his clients). "For one thing, because SMAs are a more
personalized product and solution, we tend to have very close
relationships with our clients. And I believe clients will expect that
kind of relationship to continue with the new advisor. But if they end
up being transitioned to a more generic product, and with that, maybe
more generic treatment, many just aren't going to hang around."
Many industry experts agree. According to Mark
Tibergien, a principal in the Seattle-based consulting firm, Moss Adams
LLP, the "stickiness" of a client after a sale is always a question
mark, and it becomes a bigger one with each additional change. "It's
not unusual for the buyer to pay the seller over the course of three
years based on revenue generated," he says. "As a result, every client
who doesn't stay put reduces the amount of money the seller gets. And
remember, the sale of a practice is traumatic for the clients. And if
that sale goes to someone who isn't as passionate about SMAs, or
generally does things differently than the previous owner, it is going
to set off alarm bells for some."
The word, in short, is "disruption," and it is the
one thing that clients never want when it comes to the management of
their assets, especially high-net-worth and the ultrahigh-net-worth
clients. However, Tibergien continued, many concerns regarding sales of
SMA practices are largely psychological. "The psychological effects can
be significant," agrees Scott MacKillop, president of US Fiduciary LP,
with offices in Sugarland, Texas and Chicago, " because the clients
have become more like family members or friends to the advisor, in a
sense."
Tibergien's point about the costly ramifications to
changing the business after the fact is key. As everyone in the
industry knows, the factors that go into establishing the sale price
for advisory businesses are complex. But, reduced to its simplest
elements, it's fair to say that businesses with strong fundamentals,
high assets and a strong client base with growth potential will fetch a
good price. The question of what kind of products clients are holding
is not very high on that list. Especially because the idea of working
with an advisor in the first place is that the client cedes the
specifics of investment decisions to the advisor. What clients want, of
course, is an agreed-upon mix of stability, risk management,
preservation and growth. The vehicles used to attain those goals are up
to the advisor. And clients rarely worry as long as the goals are being
met.
But there is a counterpoint to the idea. It's the
result of the overall success independents have had building an
industry around the kind of personalized service-including the value of
good advice and being a fiduciary-not necessarily seen in the
traditional brokerage environment, according to Stephen Winks, industry
consultant and publisher of Senior Consultant newsletter. "RIAs have
carved out their niche around close relationships with customers, and
specifically on the idea that there exists a personal connection beyond
just dollars and sense. That means that clients of these firms have
rightly come to expect a different level of service."
Valuation expert and attorney David Grau, president
of Business Transitions in Portland, Ore., says, "The higher standard
of care is an obvious outgrowth of the very nature of the separate
account business. Most SMA advisors, especially those who are wealth
managers, say they feel closer to their affluent SMA clients-obviously
more so than, say, a transaction-based broker with 1,000 mutual fund
clients-and they are more tuned-in to their families, their lifestyles,
their estate and legacy planning goals. Again, this prompts the seller
to make sure the buyer has the same, or similar, philosophy of having a
client-centered practice as the seller does."
It cannot be overstated that the concerns
surrounding the sale of an SMA practice must be looked at from the
client's perspective. It must be understood that the client and advisor
have "bonded" with each other, and the professional money management
details are almost secondary to the trust factor of the relationship.
As Mark Dransfield, president of First Allied in San Diego, rightly
notes, "Since the SMA advisor is usually working with skilled, outside,
independent money managers to handle the clients' accounts, it becomes
a seamless transition from buyer to seller. All that really changes is
the 'relationship' manager."
And from the buyer and seller's perspective that is
absolutely right. But from the client's perspective, that relationship
manager (the advisor) is key. "As the relationship manager of the SMA
clients, the advisor tends to know more about the client and his or her
family, attending the birthday parties, the christenings, the golden
wedding anniversaries and so on," continues Dransfield. " There is a
special connection that occurs, especially with a small but very
high-net-worth practice. That's why I think the biggest hurdle will be
the personality changes within the practice, from seller to buyer.
Also, a big concern is whether or not the purchaser can maintain those
kinds of relationships with the current clients that the seller has
already established and enjoyed over the past 20 years or so. Usually
the answer is no, not within a short period of time."
The critical key point Dransfield makes about
maintaining the long-term relationship is the expected generational
transfer of wealth within the seller's client base-taking the existing
relationships down to a less personal level by the new owner will have
an impact that goes beyond just the immediate clients' accounts. "The
buyer, depending on the demographics of the clients, must consider that
if the clients are older and they begin to retire, then pass away, and
the assets are passed down to the heirs, well, if the buyer does not
have a relationship with the heirs ... these children or grandchildren
may take the inheritance and buy a house in Beverly Hills, buy a yacht,
go on cruises, pay off debt," he says. "So it's important for the
potential buyer to look at the client demographics when he or she does
their due diligence. If the clients are in an older age group and the
purchaser doesn't have time to cement these relationships-well, out
goes $50 million or more in [current or potential] assets, and they
realize they have overpaid for the business."
MacKillop agrees with both Dransfield and Grau.
Having been in the SMA business for close to 30 years, developing
separate account platforms and consulting for some of the industry's
largest asset managers, he has seen many successes and even some
disasters in buying and selling. And he, too, is squarely in the corner
of those who say any sale of an SMA practice to a buyer not exclusively
focused on that business puts long-established client relationships at
risk. "I have worked with numerous SMA advisors over the years and the
very nature of these practices is quite different. My belief is that
the number one risk is the buyer will lose too many accounts and,
consequently, compensation down the road will erode. The potential for
a huge 'disconnect' among the buyer, seller and the clients is most
definitely there," he says, concurring with the consensus.
Says MacKillop: "If the seller has worked diligently
over the years cultivating the generational transfer of the clients'
assets to the heirs, and if the new owner does not continue cultivating
the relationships, or does not understand the intricacies of both the
relationships or the money management, then the new owner will not be
able to "harvest" the benefit of all of that hard work over the years
by the selling advisor."
So, all of that said, what special burden is there
on the seller of an SMA practice? First and foremost, say the experts,
is due diligence, but not in the strict fiduciary sense that is always
required in the sale of business. Tibergien says, "What the seller must
do is make sure the buyer is not just buying the business to
incorporate it into a different business model." And to protect the
clients' comfort level, and by extension, the longer-term money coming
from the sale, the seller should sell the business not when they are
completely ready to retire, but rather when they have an extended
period of time to be part of the transition. "As the seller you should
be prepared to spend anywhere from two to five years keeping an eye on
the business," he added.
In addition to creating a prudent practice so that
all the tangible strengths of the organization are transferable, Steve
Winks agrees that the seller must create the right mechanism for
oversight "either by serving as consultant for a period of time or else
overseeing some similar type of successor management put in place."
When asked about the ideal way to discuss with
clients the transition and all that it entails, Scott MacKillop says
that you can't cut corners. "Having one-on-one conversations with as
many clients as possible is a great benefit for them. Doing a client
appreciation event and announcing it to everyone will definitely not
work in anyone's favor." He believes clients would be negatively
affected by this approach. "With advanced planning and time management,
the seller might try segmenting the clients into various categories ...
starting with having face-to-face meetings with the largest clients and
making your way down to friendly phone calls to the smallest, and you
might find that many of the smaller or newer clients (or those less
involved) may not be affected one way or the other as long as their
money continues to be managed effectively," he says.
MacKillop offers a last word to a prospective buyer,
emphasizing that, without question, any buyer of an good-sized SMA
practice "must possess consultative skills, specifically, otherwise it
is going to be a difficult transitioning to this world." He also
cautions the buyer, "Client relationships can be so fragile you might
not even realize you have lost a client until you receive the paperwork
from them. And you may not get a second chance at serving the client if
that happens."