The large custodial firms are ramping up their technology assistance for advisors.
Judging from the feedback I receive, advisors are
more interested in technological issues than they were a few years ago.
Many advisors I hear from willingly admit that they are not operating
in an optimal technological environment, and many fully believe that
prudent spending on their technological infrastructure will yield a
good return on their investment. What many of these firms lack,
however, is a trusted source of technological advice.
While a number of independent consultants (including
one associated with the author) offer independent technology advice,
the major custodians to independent advisors all have identified
technology as an area where they can provide a valuable service to
clients, and in some cases to prospective clients. I recently spoke
with representatives of four major custodians (Schwab, TD Ameritrade,
Pershing and Fidelity) to see what type of technological assistance
they provide on either a systematic or ad hoc basis.
Schwab
According to Dan Skiles, vice president of
technology at Schwab Institutional, his firm has ten regionally based
technology consultants who work closely with the various Schwab
institutional sales offices. "These technology consultants are capable
of assisting in all aspects of technology," says Skiles. This means
that in addition to helping advisors make better use of tools offered
directly by Schwab through their Web site and through other channels,
Schwab technology consultants will also assist firms with back-office
issues and third-party software.
Skiles says that his firm offers both comprehensive
consultations and shorter targeted consultations. A comprehensive "soup
to nuts" evaluation would cover everything from an evaluation of a
firm's CRM software to its back-office processes. Such a comprehensive
engagement can take up to several days on site, with additional time
devoted to reporting, implementation and follow-up. Skiles says that
the primary goal of each consultation is to shorten the technological
learning curve for advisors.
A comprehensive evaluation results in a consulting
report. The report outlines areas within the firm that are operating
efficiently, and those that could be improved. According to Skiles, all
recommendations are accompanied by a detailed action plan. In addition,
the report contains estimated results that implementation might
produce. So, if a piece of software that costs $5,000 is estimated to
save 100 hours of labor annually, and the cost of that labor (salary,
benefits, equipment, etc.) is $7,500 annually, the advisor has the
information necessary to make an intelligent decision.
Shorter engagements generally are arranged to target
one or more specific issues. This might be something like automating a
single task or identifying a new CRM package that meets a firm's needs.
In 2006, Schwab completed an estimated 750 engagements, consisting of
roughly 100 comprehensive engagements and 650 shorter engagements.
TD Ameritrade
TD Ameritrade currently has nine regionally based
technology consultants, says Brian Stimpfl, managing director of
business solutions at TD Ameritrade Institutional. According to
Stimpfl, the Solutions Consulting Group was a natural evolution of TD's
service offering. "A few years ago, advisors started calling and asking
for more help with Veo, TD's online platform for advisors, as well as
other tools of ours, so we created a group to go and provide live help
to our best advisors. Over time, as advisors asked for advice on a
broader range of issues, our group has evolved to offer consulting
advice that extends beyond what TD Ameritrade has built."
Like Schwab, TD offers both comprehensive and
shorter, targeted engagements, and the similarities don't end there.
When conducting comprehensive engagements, TD consultants can spend
multiple days on site, monitoring workflows and interviewing staff. The
findings are presented in a comprehensive written report. The report
offers specific recommendations, a detailed action plan, costs and
estimated returns on investment. TD will also assist with
implementation. Then, they will follow up, monitoring the firm's
progress over time.
Shorter engagements usually target specific needs. Stimpfl estimates
that the group will conduct approximately 50 comprehensive engagements
in 2007, and roughly 550 shorter ones. According to Stimpfl, the
primary goal of these engagements is to help advisors grow. "This helps
the advisor, it helps our business and most importantly it helps the
public by expanding our advisors' capacity to serve them."
Pershing
"Pershing's extensive technological offering is
enough to meet the needs of many advisors," says John Iachello, chief
operating officer of Pershing Advisor Solutions LLC. On the other hand,
many advisors require additional technological tools, and Pershing
wants to help.
A Pershing relationship consultant visits each RIA
client at least once a quarter. The focus of the visits is on improving
the business of the RIA. When a consultant identifies a technological
need, the consultant can access the appropriate resources at Pershing
to offer a solution.
Since Pershing primarily targets larger advisory firms, it is unusual
for these firms to have 100% of their assets with Pershing. According
to Iachello, the typical client has at least $200 million with
Pershing, representing about one-third of the firm's total assets under
management.
Larger firms with multiple custodial relationships
"are a completely different world" from smaller RIA firms doing all
their business with a single custodian, he says. A larger firm might
have at least three layers of software. For example, there's a
front-end platform for generating trades; then there is the custodial
platform. In addition, there is the back end, which aggregates
everything on the client firm's side.
In order to operate efficiently, all of these
software products must communicate with each other. Trent Witthoeft,
vice president of Pershing Advisor Solutions LLC, says his firm can
help in at least two ways. First, Pershing will help recommend specific
products. "We are familiar with many of the products an advisor is
likely to consider in a product category," says Witthoeft. Since
Pershing is familiar with the RIAs' needs, the company can usually help
them to find a good match. In addition, says Witthoeft: "We will go out
and help install the software. We will help manage the software, too."
Second, because of its background working as a broker to brokers,
Pershing is used to building software bridges between software
products. For some clients, Pershing will help create interfaces so
that an advisor's software (or the software the advisor buys from a
third party) can communicate with Pershing's software.
Fidelity
Fidelity has a team of technology specialists that
regularly visits RIA offices and offers end-to-end technology
assessments. These specialists audit operations and provide reports on
how firms can improve their operations.
"What we are finding over the last year is that
financial advisors are facing challenges about how they grow and manage
their businesses efficiently," says Gary Gallagher, senior vice
president at Fidelity Registered Investor Advisor Group. "Now the
growth is there, but as studies by Moss Adams and others reveal, the
costs often are outpacing growth because advisors are being asked to do
a lot more and take on more complex matters. It's putting a lot of
pressure on margins."
One major challenge that Fidelity Tech specialists
find is common to many firms arises from adding new applications and
maintaining the new software with existing programs so that they can
still interface with other parts of the office. Gallagher says that
Fidelity itself is devising new programs that eliminate duplicative
tasks like having to re-key data while also minimizing errors.
Later this year, the custodian will roll out a
customized, integrated CRM platform and financial planning platform for
RIAs. The CRM system, a customized version of Oracle's Siebel CRM on
Demand, and the financial planning application, EISI's Naviplan
Central, are Web-based applications that will be integrated into
Fidleity's Advisor CHANNEL platform for advisors.
Key Findings
While free technology consulting sounds great, all
of the custodians acknowledged that they cannot provide this service to
every one of their RIA clients. They do, however, try to leverage the
knowledge they gain in these engagements in such a way that it benefits
many more of their clients. For example, all of the custodians offer
regional seminars where their advisors can network and share ideas. All
of the custodians host a national conference where technology sessions
are held. In addition, TD Ameritrade and Schwab have participated in
the annual Technology Tools for Today Conference. At all of these
venues, technology consultants from the respective firms disseminate
selected findings from the consulting engagements they've undertaken.
Let's look at some of the things they've uncovered.
According to Stimpfl, TD Ameritrade has identified
five key processes that are universal across all the firms they've
visited. The average firm, he says, spends 300 hours per year on
opening new accounts, 350 hours per year on trading, 360 hours per year
on generating performance reports, 390 hours per year on managing
workflows throughout the office and 450 hours per year doing data
reconciliation between custodial downloads and portfolio management
software. Bear in mind that these are just averages, and in some cases
they understate the problem. For example, in the area of
reconciliation, some firms outsource all or part of the process, so
they might only spend 50 hours or less per year on reconciliation. That
means that the remaining firms are spending much more than 450 hours
per year on this task. Since these processes take up so much time, it
should be obvious that any productivity gains here will yield
significant savings, and the recommendations that TD Ameritrade has
made in recent engagements bears this out.
In 65% of engagements, TD Ameritrade consultants have made
recommendations to streamline a firm's account-opening process. In 65%
of engagements, they have recommended changes in the workflow process
and/or the client relationship management (CRM) system. Fully 61% of
the engagements resulted in recommendations to implement or improve
paperless office systems. When it came to streamlining trading
processes, consultants identified significant opportunities for
improvement in 57% of the cases. Finally, in 100% of the engagements,
consultants identified at least one significant outsourcing
opportunity. "The specific outsourcing recommendation varied greatly by
firm," says Stimpfl, "because each firm is different, but outsourcing
is reasonably priced and it is too much of an opportunity to ignore."
Skiles notes that Schwab's findings vary somewhat
based on firm size. Generally speaking, smaller firms, which Skiles
defines as those with less than ten employees, appear to be somewhat
overwhelmed by technology. That is, the principals of the firm have so
much going on that they tend not to think about technology in a
strategic way. With firms of this size, Schwab technology personnel
will try to identify about half a dozen technology changes that can
have a substantial impact on the firm. Skiles believes that smaller
firms will not want to tackle all the half dozen suggestions at one
time, nor should they. "Initially, we'd like to see the firm pick one
or two of our recommendations to implement." Depending on the nature of
the recommendation, implementation could take weeks, or it could take
months. Presumably, if the initial recommendations are implemented
successfully, and they yield the expected results, the firm then will
be encouraged to make further technological upgrades.
In the case of larger firms, those with at least ten
to 20 employees, Skiles says that part of his team's job is making sure
that technology is meeting the needs of all people at the firm. "With
larger firms, the needs of people working in various departments might
be different." It is not unusual, says Skiles, to see a firm spending
heavily on technology in some areas, but not in others.
If a system is designed to be used by everyone at a firm, it is
important to get input from all areas of the firm before a solution is
implemented. "If you don't get everyone's input, then not everyone will
use it. If you have 20 employees, and only 11 have input into the
process, odds are only 11 will use it; nine won't. If this turns out to
be the case, you will only get about half the return you expected on
your investment."
Skiles also emphasized the importance of training.
In order to get the maximum return on investment, sufficient training
is a must, he says.
Pershing's Witthoeft says his firm's advisors, who
fall squarely in the larger-firm camp, have lately had a keen interest
in pre-trade execution management, post-trade execution management,
tax-efficient rebalancing and performance attribution.
Some issues transcend size, however, and the issues
that Schwab has identified are remarkably similar to those mentioned by
TD Ameritrade. These include better handling of routine tasks such as
trading, billing and reporting, paperless office technologies and
work-flow-related issues. Skiles adds that most advisors they visit
have some sort of CRM system in place, but it often is either
underutilized or insufficient to meet the firm's needs.
Conclusions
The major custodians are clearly making an effort to
provide a high level of technological expertise to their best clients
and prospects. While not every advisor will qualify for personalized
service, most custodians are attempting to systematically store and
organize the data they collect during live engagements in a way that
can benefit a much larger audience.
Based on the data TD Ameritrade and Schwab shared
with me, it appears clear that a large number of RIA firms are
operating suboptimally in a number of key areas. These include data
reconciliation, work flow, performance reporting, trading and new
account openings. If your firm is "typical," there is a good chance
that you could have inefficiencies in one or more of these areas too.
If you want to uncover opportunities to increase effectiveness within
your practice, the findings of the custodians offer you some excellent
hints as to where you should start looking.