Robo SMAs


Op/Ed By Gerard Michael/CEO of Smartleaf

Robos — more precisely, robo technology — pose a threat to a key player in the industry, but it’s not advisors. It’s mutual fund companies. The threat comes in the form of what we’ll call “robo SMAs” — customizable, tax-optimized separately managed accounts managed at low cost using automated account setup and rebalancing technology.

We’ve previously posted on why SMA’s are better than mutual funds for most assets (A Guide to Mutual Funds vs. SMAs). We’ve also posted on the special case of direct index SMAs and why they’re better and potentially cheaper than ETFs (Direct Indexes are Better than ETFs and Direct Indexes: Cheaper than ETFs?).

You can read more in these previous posts, but the basic idea is that SMAs are more tax efficient, and unlike mutual funds, they’re customizable. With SMAs it’s also easier and faster to launch new products — no new registrations or legal documents are needed — you just have to create a new model portfolio. And under the right conditions, SMAs are also less expensive to operate. What are the right conditions? You need two things:

The scary thing for mutual fund companies is that these technologies already exist:

To make all this happen, the mutual fund companies will have to do one more thing: make account setup and onboarding easy. Really easy. Being an outsourced overlay manager is a subadvisory service that requires the signoff of the investor and the custodian. But robo advisors have demonstrated the viability of automated, real-time setup of advisory accounts.

Original Post

Gerard Michael is CEO of Smartleaf, a leading fintech provider of automated portfolio rebalancing and tax optimization for wealth managers, RIAs, TAMPs, broker dealers and banks.