Why Are So Many Universal Life Insurance Policies Failing?
December 12, 2018
• Page 2 of 2
To illustrate this point: A 50-year old man in Preferred health can purchase a $1,000,000 Current Assumption UL policy for an annual premium of $8,808 per year, based on the insurance carrier’s current crediting rate of 3.90 percent. If the crediting rate were to stay level at 3.90 percent, with no changes in scheduled policy charges, the policy’s cash value would gradually rise up to a peak value of just under $79,000 at age 70, and then gradually diminish a little bit each year until falling to only $9 of cash value at age 100. The projected economics of this policy shown in the following chart:
I can't speak for the industry as a whole but working for Hartford for couple decades the illustrations used showed a target premium and a premium based on the guarantees. Hartford also two options how to set up the policy. Option A used the built up cash value to reduce the cost of insurance as cash value was applied to the death benefit. Option B paid the cash accumulation on top of the death benefit. My discussions with clients was that insurance is not an investment and it is much better to pay a premium close to the guarantees and if a couple decades later if cash accumulation is much better than the guarantee simply reduce the premium paid to a lower amount versus the policy running out of money just when you are more at risk of dying. Many agents tried to sell the insurance with as cheap a premium as possible not concerned with the policy surviving for 30 or 40 years as they only got paid on the policy for the first few years. With the almost zero interest rates from the federal government for the last couple decades that premium policy has saved a lot of client policies.