Structured products can round out a portfolio,
but they are complicated and potentially risky.
In this last article in a series, we
look at structured products. The first two articles examined life
settlements and structured settlements.
During the past few years, structured products have
enjoyed steady growth. These complex instruments are designed to
provide capital and income protection, diversification for portfolios
and customized solutions for both institutional and increasingly retail
markets. The largest issuers of these vehicles include large domestic
and foreign commercial banks and investment firms like JP Morgan,
Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, UBS, Goldman
Sachs and Wachovia Corp.
Structured products are popular in Europe, Canada,
Latin America, Asia and Australia. Yet many wealth managers and
financial advisors have never heard of them.
Just what are structured products and how do they
work? What role, if any, could they play in your clients' portfolios?
Structured products are hard to define. They can be a grab bag of
different asset classes. But basically, the term is used to apply to
anything that's structured. They usually include products linked to
equity, fixed-income, indexes, interest rates, commodities, mutual
funds and hedge funds. They generally, but not always, involve a
complicated series of cash flow or derivative transactions.
"Typically, there is a particular aim involved,
whether, for example, to raise money or reduce risk with respect to an
asset, and a product can be structured to achieve that aim," says Lucy
Farr, a partner in the New York law firm Davis Polk & Wardell, some
of whose clients are issuers of structured products. "What makes them
complicated is that they implicate a lot of complex and difficult
concepts, including legal, tax, accounting and regulatory issues."
Structured products can be created and packaged by
different institutions in various formats. JPMorgan, for example, has
structured products with payouts tied to equities, interest rates,
commodities, foreign currencies, mutual funds and hedge funds. They are
being sold either as private placements or registered notes to
institutions and retail customers. The product can be principal
protected or income protected. If it's principal protected, it's
usually a relatively safe investment while still offering the investor
the opportunity to participate on the upside.
Issuance of structured products in the U.S. is
growing rapidly. In 2005 new issues grew by 16% with nearly $50 billion
in new structured products launched, according to the Structured
Products Association (SPA), a newly formed trade group for the industry
based in New York. In 2005, there were more than $12 billion in
SEC-registered structured products issued and more than $17 billion in
equity-linked certificates of deposits and private placements in the
U.S. Although significant, the U.S. structured products market remains
small compared to the European market, where issuances surpass $100
billion annually, according to the SPA.
Keith A. Styrcula, chairman and founder of the trade
group, says growth in the industry in the U.S. today resembles that of
hedge funds in the 1990s. "Six, seven years ago, many mainstream
investors were just beginning to understand what a hedge fund is,"
Styrcula says. "The same could be said about structured products at
this point in time."
For many retail clients, these products can be
substituted for more traditional instruments, such as mutual funds,
under the right circumstances. Some are sold in denominations as low as
$1,000. For high-net-worth individuals, it's possible to have such
products customized to fit a client's particular risk profile. "It's a
creative way to monetize a view of an underlying asset with a payout
that meets your client's needs, whether it's with principal protection
or with a principal-at-risk structure," says Michael Camacho, managing
director of structured investments at JPMorgan.
One such vehicle at JPMorgan is a "Return Enhanced
Note" linked to the Nikkei-225 Stock Index with an 18-month maturity.
With this product, if you expect the Nikkei to rise, you could
potentially receive three times its performance at maturity, subject to
a maximum total return of 40%. The downside risk is the same as owning
the index.
Another product is a five-year certificate of
deposit that provides full principal protection at maturity, and in
addition, 100% of the upside performance of a global equity index
basket consisting of the S&P 500 Index, the Nikkei 225 Index and
the Dow Jones Euro Stoxx 50 Index. If the basket is negative at
maturity you get only your principal back. "We tend to issue these in
certificate-of-deposit form or as registered notes," says Scott
Mitchell, a vice president in JPMorgan's Structured Investments group.
"The benefit of the CD is that they are FDIC-insured, and they have an
estate feature so if the holder dies the estate can redeem the
certificate at par value."
Recently, JPMorgan rolled out a "Best of Constant
Maturity Treasury" note, with a 3 1/2-year maturity that pays interest
quarterly in the form of a coupon, based on whichever yield is highest
among the two-year, five-year and ten-year Constant Maturity Treasury
Rates at the time of the reset. Says Mitchell: "The interest rate is
reset each quarter, the rationale being that the Note should outperform
traditional LIBOR-based floating rate debt if the Treasury curve
steepens." The product is being marketed as an alternative to a money
market investment.
On the fixed-income side, Morgan Stanley has an
inflation-linked note with a ten-year maturity. Every year it pays the
investor a coupon, which is equal to the rate of inflation over one
year plus 2.2%. So if inflation is, say, 4%, you would get a return of
6.2%. And if inflation spikes up to, say, 10%, you'd get 12.2%. By
comparison, inflation savings bonds, or iBonds, are currently paying
only 1% above inflation.
Some institutions have come out with structured
products tied to commodities. They allow investors to obtain an
efficient exposure to commodities, and can provide either partial or
full downside protection. One example is a "Triple Appreciation Note"
with a maturity of 18 months, which is linked to the Goldman Sachs
Commodity Index Excess Return, being marketed by PNB Paribas.
How does it work? On the upside, if the index rises,
the investor receives three times the percentage increase of the index,
subject to a maximum of 30%. So, for instance, if the index was up 7%
at maturity, your gain would be 21%. The investor is fully exposed on
the downside, however, if the index loses value at maturity.
"If you're moderately bullish on commodities, such a
note may allow you to outperform the market," says Serge Troyanovsky, a
director in the equities and derivatives group at BNP Paribas in New
York. "You get triple return on the upside, but you still retain full
downside exposure."
Another product at PNP Paribas is a three-year, 100%
principal protected product linked to a basket of commodities. Such a
basket could contain individual commodities, such as precious metals,
base metals, crude oil or heating oil and natural gas. If the basket
increases in volume, investors get full participation of the upside. If
the basket declines in value, on the other hand, you simply get your
principal back with no loss, Troyanovsky explains.
Once primarily designed as investments for
sophisticated institutions, these products have begun to filter down to
the retail level. Some wealth managers and advisors are using or at
least investigating them. Carl J. Kunhardt, a CPF with Quest Capital
Management in Dallas, recently used a version of a structured product
to facilitate a client's monetization of a concentrated position in
company stock worth approximately $2.5 million.
As Kunhardt explains, his client was president of a
large national company in Houston. "Due to his position, he maintained
a significant number of restricted shares in the company. With his
retirement, he recognized he needed to diversify his position, as we
recommended. The challenge was that a majority of his shares were
restricted, due to his position and the fact they had been offered
through private placements as part of the executive compensation
program. Also, because of the significant separation payouts he was
receiving, we did not want to recognize the tax liability of such a
large position in the same year.
"We recommended that he monetize his position
through a prepaid forward contract. This structured product works
similarly to traded options, but is done as a private transaction.
Using the structured product department at our broker-dealer, we
obtained a counterparty that would advance 100% of the current value
and allow the client to participate up to 120% of the value ... the
counter-party would keep any upside beyond this. The fee was built into
the contract, which in effect provided the client with 87% of the value
with upside potential. The length of the contract was one year."
Kunhardt says, "We've issued it before as a hedging
strategy and will continue to use it as an out-of-the box alternative
in bringing value-added to our relationships" with clients.
To be sure, not all advisors are enamored of these
vehicles. Bob Rockwell, a CFP licensee with Cambridge Investment
Research in Sandy, Ore., has investigated them and concluded: "It's
expensive to protect your principal. In some products you're giving up
40% or more of your return in order to make sure you don't have a
temporary loss. What I've found is my clients would rather put up with
the volatility and get 100% of the market return taxed at the more
favorable 15% capital gains rate, versus losing a larger percentage of
their return and being taxed at the regular income tax rate."
Before putting your clients into any of these
products, you should weigh their risks, which can include market and
interest rate risk, embedded leverage and reduced liquidity, credit
risk in respect to the issuer and uncertain tax treatment, says Anna T.
Pinedo, a partner in Morrison & Foerster, a New York law firm that
advises issuers of structured products and broker-dealers who market
them.
Regulators also are eyeing these products. The NASD
in October 2005 issued a notice that described its concerns, focusing
on investor suitability and adequacy of disclosure.
Bruce W. Fraser, principal of Bruce
W. Fraser Communications in New York, has written for many
publications. He can be reached at [email protected]. Visit him at
www.bwfraser.com/home.