“We think it is shocking and patently unjust for Goldman to wait for nine years after the case was filed to raise these issues and for Goldman to receive only a slap on the wrist for its misconduct in slamming so many women with expansive arbitration clauses buried in equity award agreements,” Kelly M. Dermody, a lawyer for the women, said in an email.
The case is Chen-Oster v. Goldman Sachs & Co., 10-cv-06950, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
This article was provided by Bloomberg News.