Stephen Moore’s chances for winning a seat on the Federal Reserve Board are looking increasingly uncertain after two key Republican senators expressed their concerns about President Donald Trump’s choice to serve on the central bank.
Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa and Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama withheld endorsements of Moore, a Heritage Foundation fellow and a former Trump campaign adviser.
“I’m not enthused about what he has said in various articles,” Ernst, the Senate’s fourth-ranking Republican, told reporters on Monday while heading into a leadership meeting. “I think it’s ridiculous.”
Later Monday, Shelby, the former chairman of the Banking Committee, said he thought the proposed nomination has “some problems” and is causing concern among Republican senators. “It looks like drip by drip” on Moore’s prospects, Shelby said.
The White House’s selection of Moore runs the risk of unraveling a little more than a week after the president’s other choice for the Fed Board, former Godfather’s Pizza Inc. chief executive Herman Cain, withdrew from consideration.
The remarks by Ernst and Shelby came hours after Trump’s top economic adviser said the White House still backs Moore for the job. “We’re still behind him,” National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow said. “No change in our position.”
On Tuesday, White House adviser Kellyanne Conway reiterated that Trump still backs Moore. But she added that Moore has said he’d withdraw if he’s a liability for the administration. For now, Moore is comfortable still being considered, Conway said.
If nominated by Trump, Moore can lose no more than three Republican senators, assuming all of the chamber’s Democrats vote against him.
He has come under scrutiny for a range of controversial public remarks, including columns he wrote for the National Review more than 15 years ago that disparaged women. He wrote, for example, that women tennis pros wanted “equal pay for inferior work.” Moore has called the columns a “spoof.”
Moore was also found in contempt of court after he failed to pay his former wife about $300,000 in alimony after their 2010 divorce, and the Internal Revenue Service won a judgment against him for about $75,000 in unpaid taxes and penalties in 2018. He has said the tax debt resulted from an accounting error and that he’s contesting it.