Central to Temur’s case is that his mother was aware of his trading -- even if she disapproved -- and that it was never part of any attempt to put the money out of reach. But Tatiana said her eldest son played a leading role in the plan and was involved as early as September 2015, before the divorce ruling the following year.
“If the Tatiana problem did not exist, my father would not move his assets anywhere,” Temur wrote in an email at the time.
This article was provided by Bloomberg News.