Subscribe_april2012

Online Extras

Print |
March 04, 2011

Five Commandments Of Risk Management

Advisors must adapt to the post-financial-crisis environment by rethinking their approaches for managing portfolios.
By Mitchell Eichen and Mark Pearlman   
Now that the trauma of the 2008 financial crisis is fading behind us, advisors can’t afford to fall back on old modes of thinking. Individual investors have been deeply scarred and fundamental factors presage a bumpy road ahead--in this new environment the same-old approaches just won’t do. We need a systematic framework to help advisors progress in a way that is not purely reactionary, but also practical and productive. We call this new framework Risk 3.0.

Risk 3.0 organizes the past evolution of the financial industry both by risk conditions and the strategies the industry has developed to address these conditions. In this way we can begin to better define our current, unprecedented risk environment and better evolve in response.

The starting point for this organization of investment risk management is Harry Markowitz’s theory of optimal asset allocation and the development of Modern Portfolio Theory in the 1950s and ’60s. These basic methods of diversification, which are still core to investing today, gave investors the tools to quantify and mitigate market risk. This we like to call Risk 1.0.

While Risk 1.0 improved the risk profile of an entire portfolio, it did not manage the risk of any particular asset. The creation of the Black-Scholes model in 1973 to price and sell financial derivatives--whether options, futures or swaps--opened the door to new tools for maximizing asset certainty. Aided by advances in computing, the quantification and securitization of options and hedging strategies lead to their widespread application in the rapidly expanding hedge fund and alternative investment universe. The evolution of this trend, when combined with Risk 1.0, was the use of hedged and other alternative investments as core portfolio holdings in new risk management approaches such as the Endowment Model. This we call Risk 2.0.

For the past 30 years, Risk 1.0 and Risk 2.0 approaches were the standard tools of portfolio management. Yet the financial crisis of 2008-2009 dramatically revealed the limitations of these methods in the face of extreme market volatility and fragile financial institutions. Now we face a new market reality defined by the combined headwinds of reregulation, rock-bottom interest rates, continued deleveraging, high unemployment and slow economic growth. Add to that an increasingly interdependent and globalized economy--in which even remote shocks can have far-reaching consequences--and the most likely market outlook is a grim blend of persistent volatility and periodic crisis. To address such a challenging environment, a new risk-centric paradigm is needed: One where return follows risk, not vice versa, and risk management methods are designed for a wide range of market conditions. This is the era of Risk 3.0.

In this respect, Risk 3.0 is both a framework for understanding the current challenges confronting the financial industry and also for evaluating new risk management methods in the context of what has come before. Risk 3.0’s ultimate goal is to guide investors and professionals to pragmatic investment solutions that combine the best of previous approaches while also being optimized for current risk realities. For example, building a Risk 3.0-optimized portfolio will require more attention to the true liquidity of its assets, the credit risk of seemingly stable counterparties and the reality that correlations go to 100% when investors panic. This requires a shift in thinking from a “performance-centric” to a “risk-centric” approach in portfolio construction.

We can codify this risk-centric philosophy using five Risk 3.0 Commandments. They are:

1. Risk is central: Do not think you can know the unknowable or predict the unpredictable.

2. Risk is not uniform: Market conditions continually vary and risk takes many forms--be prepared.

3. Risk has no blanket cure:
Techniques need to be optimized for different market scenarios and types of risk.

4. Risk-adjusted returns matter:
You should not take uncompensated risk, but must be appropriately rewarded for the level of risk taken.

5. Risk is not static:
Constant monitoring and reevaluation are required.

This is our call to action. As advisors continue to adapt to the post-crisis environment, we believe Risk 3.0 offers a framework for organizing and shaping the conversation we are already having. Change is here whether we think about it in context or not. Welcome to the age of Risk 3.0.

Mitchell Eichen is founder and CEO and Mark Pearlman is executive vice president, business strategy, of The MDE Group, a leading wealth and asset management firm with offices in Morristown, N.J., and New York City. The MDE Group has been among the top 25 of Barron’s “Top 100 Independent Financial Advisors” rankings since 2007. For more about The MDE Group, visit www.mdegroup.com.

Five Commandments Of Risk Management

 
Comments
fundinvestguru  - Insights into avoiding knowable and unknowable ris   |2011-03-20 09:24:33
Words of wisdom: Some possible strategies and insights to address these acknowledged risks:
• “Risk is central: Do not think you can know the unknowable or predict the unpredictable?” I think many of us will agree that the most troubling risks this decade can be attributed to the fact that due to the interrelationship of economic trends “the only thing that goes up in a down market is correlation” as reported in a Rydex White Paper.
• “Knowable” risks might include; 1. When interest rates on newly issued similar bonds rise, bond fund values decline (the longer duration, the greater the risk; the lower the default risk, the higher the value risks), 2. Large-cap dividend-paying stocks can react like “stocks masquerading as bonds” and 3. A declining US dollar and a rising commodity-driven economy with a seller’s market in infrastructure materials combined with a strong local currency has great potential for lowered-risk and more-reliable profits.
• The growth of available sector funds from the 70 style-boxes offered by traditional funds to the more than 700 style-boxes offered by ETFs may facilitate prudent diversification of to reduce risks that are “Unknowable.”


2. “Risk is not uniform: Market conditions continually vary and risk takes many forms--be prepared.” Does this make you question the wisdom of buy-and-hold investments in passive portfolios? Does it make you think twice about the value of an experienced third-party investment advisor who has a successful track record of adapting portfolios to market conditions?

3. ‘Risk has no blanket cure: Techniques need to be optimized for different market scenarios and types of risk.” Avoid “knowable” risks and diversify to reduce “unknowable risks” or hire an experienced (10-20 years experience) portfolio manager who will.

4. “Risk-adjusted returns matter: You should not take uncompensated risk, but must be appropriately rewarded for the level of risk taken.” Allow me to suggest a few examples of properly-compensated risk: 1. High-yield or junk bonds pay higher returns to compensate for additional credit risk and junk bond funds both screen individual bond crises and diversify among individual bond holdings to both diversify and reduce those risks. 2. In the current financial crisis without the former insurance safety nets Muni-bonds, muni-bond funds may face both rising interest rate and credit risks much greater than any tax preferences. 3. The huge losses in 401(k) Company stock investments in large-cap stocks and broad indices in this 21st century during the 50% down markets in 2000-2002 and 2007-2009 that did the greatest harm to retirement savers. The ill-timed introduction of ill-considered target maturity funds and over-cautious and interfering employee savings plans added insult to injury. Half of all direct savings contributions ever made to tax-deferred savings plans has been lost to poor investments.

5. “Risk is not static: Constant monitoring and reevaluation are required.” However, that vigilance is not warranted if the advisor does not have a plan to adapt the portfolio to reflect a revised strategy. That’s understandable as few, if any, fund families pay 12b1 fees or charge loads on balances defensively shifted to cash and/or provide access to bear market funds. The latter can be like “grabbing a falling knife.”

The final insight I would like to provide is that there are enough high-return low-risk funds and separate accounts from which to choose wisely. Such funds provide some strategic shelter from both knowable and unknowable risks.

Yes, it is time to rethink risk to help your clients another “lost decade.”
Please login to write comments.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 PW May 2012
Click Here

Online Extras

Putting Retirement Changes Into Perspective
Three major shifts are fundamentally changing retirement, says Columnist Robert Laura.
Read more...
 
Consider Adapting Asset Allocation To Retirement Spending Needs
“Chasing yield” can lead investors to buy questionable investments merely because they offer—at least temporarily—enticing income streams. To effectively manage retirement income, it’s important to consider the actual liabilities.
Read more...
 

FAgreen

Chesapeake Director’s Firm Paid $343 Million Amid Ties
Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s decision to cut directors’ pay and other perks may save the company up to $1.65 million a year without addressing investors’ concern that the board failed to rein in Chief Executive Officer Aubrey McClendon’s borrowing and spending spree.
Read more...

On The Move

LPL Financial Names Executive Vice President Of Business Consulting
Robert Comfort will lead business consulting for institutional services division.
Read more...
 
LPL Financial Names Managing Director And Chief Human Capital Officer
Sallie Larsen brings more than three decades of human resources experience to her new role.
Read more...
 

Quick Poll

Do you think buying Facebook shares now is a good idea?