Market volatility never feels good. The kind we’ve felt amid the coronavirus pandemic has been particularly taxing. Of course, this is no ordinary moment in history. It will be a defining moment for individuals, businesses and industries worldwide.

Long-term stock investors know they are buying into the perceived future value of a company. That’s exactly why it’s important to look past the next few weeks to the months and years ahead. Chances are the world will look very different than it did when we started 2020 ― and that can mean new doors for investors to explore.

In a previous post, I spoke about creating a shopping list for your portfolio for the more immediate rise out of the crisis. Today I’ll focus on five areas I think may look very different as the world recalibrates from a health crisis that tested every aspect of daily life.

1. Technology To Power A Low-Contact World
Technology was a strong performer before the crisis and is well poised to be a winner going forward. The crisis has turbocharged trends already in motion: remote offices, online education, online gaming, and streaming. We expect these and many more manifestations of a virtual life, now widespread and embraced, will only accelerate, and the software and infrastructure to support them will be in increased demand.

Beyond that, technology to power contact-free activity of all sorts could benefit. Consider driver-less delivery, telehealth and eSports. 5G could also get a boost as speed of data transfer becomes a more imminent need in remote work settings.

2. Global Vs. Local Debate
To the extent countries look inward to care for their populations and economies, we could see a move from the decades-long trend of globalization to regionalization or localization. U.S.-China trade tensions had already incited questions about the location of global supply chains and risk of concentration. Coronavirus intensified the attention.

Supply chains will need to diversify to enhance their resilience. Many countries will likely look to bring manufacturing home. Yet shifting from a concentrated to a more diversified supply chain will come with costs. Companies can either absorb these costs (which would hurt profitability) or pass them on to consumers by charging higher prices for end products (which would be inflationary).

A subplot to this global vs. local dynamic is urban vs. rural. The virus outbreak has been hardest felt in dense urban areas. These are also business centers. We could see a shrinking office footprint as populations gravitate away and remote workforces grow. Meanwhile, less-urban areas could benefit in several ways: onshoring of manufacturing would likely go to these areas; the ability to work remotely means people can relocate from urban hubs; and retirees who preferred culture centers like New York City may see disadvantages of dense areas and look to more rural settings.

3. Company Balance Sheets Reconsidered
The definition of a “solid” balance sheet may be rethought. Companies are designed to withstand recessions, but not months of zero revenue. We’ve already seen some companies in deeply affected industries cut dividends and seek to raise capital to secure themselves greater liquidity. Many of these companies had more debt than they should have. They may have made acquisitions but had levered up their balance sheets to do so. We believe use of leverage will be reassessed.

One upshot may be a decline in mergers and acquisitions (M&A), which had been elevated in recent years, as shown below. The opposing argument is that balance sheet scrutiny and recent calls to curtail share buybacks could mean any excess cash a company holds may instead be applied to M&A. We are watching these two counterforces. In either case, we expect entities with ample cash could be positioned to make some extraordinary deals with companies that are cash needy in the wake of the crisis.

First « 1 2 » Next