Companies hope that new features will overcome buyers' concerns.
The variable universal life insurance market has
been on a rollercoaster ride the past several years that has mirrored
the equity market-enjoying enormous popularity in the 1990s and being
left for dead during the bear market. Yet even though policyholders
remain scarred with memories of underfunded polices, overhyped return
projections and death benefits gone up in smoke, there are indications
that the VUL market is starting to rebound.
Companies, meanwhile, are trying to lure customers
back by getting back to basics and devoting as much attention to the
insurance component of VUL products as the asset growth component. At
The Hartford Financial Services Group, for example, officials feel the
variable universal life market is rebounding from the bear market. The
company sold about $305 million in new variable life premiums in 2004,
which made it the largest seller of variable policies in the nation for
the third year in a row.
The company also achieved a 28% increase in its
variable life sales from a year earlier. It was the first time since
2001 that the company saw an increase in sales, having seen drops of
25% and 26% in 2002 and 2003, respectively.
Jeffrey Cullen, advanced marketing consultant with
The Hartford's estate and business planning group, says the rebound in
sales has come at a time when the marketplace is changing. Buyers of
VUL policies, he says, are becoming increasingly segmented in terms of
what they're looking for. Some are looking for accumulation products,
some are looking for a death benefit and many are looking to variable
products to fill several roles in their financial planning. "We're
seeing more combination situations or double-duty dollars-people who
say, 'I want my insurance dollar to serve multiple purposes,'" Cullen
says.
Some policyholders, for example, are looking at
VUL's as a way to fill their needs for asset accumulation and stock
redemptions tied to nonqualified deferred compensation plans. Buyers of
variable life polices are also more sophisticated, Cullen says, noting
that they are more likely to want dollar cost averaging and assurances
that fixed costs will be coming out of fixed funds. "They want a
predictable flexibility pattern to pull dollars out of these contracts,
making sure the contracts don't crash," he says.
It's this changing marketplace that has given rise
to the hybrid VUL policy, which is advertised as providing the best of
both the universal life and variable life worlds-upside investment
potential together with a guaranteed death benefit-in one policy.
The Hartford's answer to the change is called the
Quantum Life policy, which gives policyholders a guaranteed death
benefit as long as they pay the necessary premium to support it. The
guarantee lapses if policyholders fail to keep up with their premiums.
Anything paid as a premium beyond what is needed to
support the guarantee are put into a tax-deferred investment account,
which can be used as supplemental income. The product includes riders
for cost of living adjustments and disability protection, and preserves
death benefits beyond the age of 100. "What we've tried to do is
segment the products to fit the needs we hear from our clients," Cullen
says.
Brett Berg, director of advanced sales with
Nationwide Financial in Columbus, Ohio, says the bear market showed the
pitfalls of depending on variable universal life policies solely as
tax-friendly vehicles for asset growth. The down period underscored the
fact that one of the chief advantages of VUL's is their ability to the
address multiple needs in one package.
"I think one of the trends we see grows out of what
is the dual purpose of the actual variable universal life contract,"
Berg says. "Both the death benefit and the supplemental retirement
income are important."
Nationwide has tried to reposition itself in the
post-bear-market VUL market by introducing the marketFlex VUL policy,
which offers policyholders tactical investment management options along
with a guaranteed death benefit if premiums are kept at a certain level.
The investment portion of the contract gives
policyholders access to 31 Rydex funds in addition to more than a dozen
core funds, according to the company. "What's contemplated is that they
will be traded more frequently and tactically managed," Berg says. "In
many cases, what we find is that advisors will partner with third-party
investment managers who have expertise in tactical allocation and in
managing these types of subaccounts."
For policyholders concerned about market volatility,
he says, "it allows them to take advantage of the ups and downs of the
market." The accounts provide more flexibility than is usually
available in a VUL subaccount, he says, noting that the tactical
accounts allow managers to respond to down markets by trading short.
While Nationwide has not yet introduced a hybrid VUL
policy, the company has responded to the demand for downside protection
in other ways, he says. The company's policy guard rider, for example,
protects against lapses in cases where cash values drop too low.
Another rider, Berg says, provides policyholders with long-term care
benefits by accelerating death benefits in cases involving a lengthy
illness or disability.
Advisors can probably expect to see more features
such as these attached to VUL policies he says, as companies continue
to deal with the "apprehension among advisors and clients" when it
comes to variable products.
"It takes a commitment by insurance companies to
develop ways to mitigate the downside risk, both in the accumulation
phase and distribution phase," Berg says.
One of the first insurance companies out of the gate
with a hybrid VUL product was Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.,
which introduced the VUL Guard policy in May 2003. It has since become
one of the company's fastest-selling products. MassMutual also saw its
VUL sales increase 35% last year-an increase company officials directly
attribute to the popularity of VUL Guard.
The company, however, has yet to make up all the
ground it lost as a result of the bear market. Whereas variable life
sales made up 30% of the company's annual sales as recently as 1999,
variable premiums now account for only about 10% of the company's
sales. "The bear market had a significant impact on variable life
sales," says Rowland Fawthorpe, second vice president and actuary at
MassMutual. "I think that's fairly the industry standard-if you didn't
have a broad product portfolio you got very hurt."
The VUL Guard product was specifically aimed at
clients who are still concerned about the market risk on their life
insurance, he says, and was designed to provide "a ground floor of life
insurance coverage." The company has also added a Survivorship VUL
Guard policy offering as a second-to-die protection vehicle for estate
planners. The products are supported by 40 subaccounts.
"What it does is it helps ensure that the variations
in the equity markets are not going to adversely effect your life
insurance policy," Fawthorpe says. "They found that they do not want or
cannot afford to have their life insurance subject to the whims of the
equity markets."
That attitude has remained even as the equity market
has rebounded, he says. Another change, he says, is that people are
more wary of under funding their policies on the front end after seeing
so many policies lapse during the bear market.
On the sales side, Fawthorpe says, the company
requires that sales of its VUL policies include a 0% return projection
and an 8% projection, and that all illustrations be signed by
policyholders. "Hopefully by now people have realized you can't
underfund or minimum-fund a variable life contract," he says.