In retrospect, it was inevitable. Sales of traditional long-term-care insurance have been dropping for years while hybrid coverage—i.e., LTC riders linked to life insurance or an annuity—have been growing in popularity. But Jesse Slome, director of the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance, a national trade group based in Westlake Village, Calif., says that sales of the linked plans have now surpassed those of their stand-alone counterparts. “No question,” he says. “There’s definitely a trend shift.”
Last year alone, sales of traditional LTC policies fell 24% from the previous year, as measured by industry research firm LIMRA, to an estimated 131,000 policies. The equivalent figure some 15 years ago was 750,000 policies sold annually.
By contrast, in the six years ending 2014, sales of life insurance with LTC benefits jumped approximately 500%. “When customers are made aware of the linked-benefits options, 98% of the time that’s what they will choose,” says Carol Jochem, vice president and insurance program manager at BMO Harris Financial Advisors in Milwaukee. “I’ve seen it time and time again.”
What Lies Behind The Numbers
The reasons for this shift are many and not terribly surprising. While insurance companies have scrambled to innovate with more attractive LTC options, providers of traditional plans have struggled cataclysmically. Poor profits—due to inadequate and premature actuarial data that underestimated payout risks, combined with low interest rates—caused many to exit the market. Over the past five years alone, MetLife, Prudential and three other large providers reduced or completely ended sales of new policies, leaving only a dozen or so providers today still offering new stand-alone LTC policies. Just 15 years ago, there were more than 100.
What’s more, surviving firms have been winning state regulatory approval to raise premium rates, sometimes by as much as 45% or more. “That hurts, for clients and for advisors,” says Steve Cain, a principal and national sales leader at NFP Long-Term Care in Los Angeles. “That’s a hard message to deliver to somebody whose money you’re supposed to be managing.”
As their rates balloon, companies have also tightened their underwriting requirements to lower their risks. “We see fewer advisors offering this type of coverage because they don’t want to deal with the process that LTC planning requires,” laments Brian Gordon, president of MAGA, a long-term-care advisory firm in Riverwoods, Ill.
Advisors May Be Skittish
Research bears this out. In June 2015, Lincoln Financial Group, the leading provider of linked LTC benefits, released a study that shows most advisors rank long-term care as among the most difficult aspects of managing clients’ retirement-income planning. Fewer than half the advisors surveyed had discussed LTC costs with the majority of their clients, and not even 10% had implemented LTC solutions for them.
Long-Term Care Options Proliferate: Are They Viable?
July 1, 2015
« Previous Article
| Next Article »
Login in order to post a comment
Comments
-
LTC benefits are going through a transition but the solution and conversation about Hybrid Products is simplistic and needs clarification. a. Not everyone wants to transfer large amounts of money for a Life Insurance with LTC benefits. There is an opportunity and tax costs to be consdered b. There is health underwriting for hybrid plans. Some plans maybe simplified and other plans are full underwriting. c. It is challenging for agents and wealth managers to know which hybrid plans to recommend. You have to be appointed with an MGA to recommend and only they may provide plan designs. Comparing plans is difficult for agents wealth managers to thinking about LTC plans. It takes time to help those who you are recommending owning a hybrid plan to absorb the idea and to accept that it is life insurance and ltc benefits. Selling on the idea of: return of premium, a beneficiary will receive dealth benefits, and if you live and need care you will receive funds to pay for care makes assumptions which may or may not occur or wanted in the future. These are plans for the future and so agents and wealth managers need to advise clients with 15, 20, or 25 years. Plans which seem wonderful in 2015 may be of value in the future. In addition, people who own the plans will put it in a file and forget about the plan and the benefits until needed.